AN ARMY OF ONE
Karin Fischer says if you want to find a model that works for low-income students, look no further than the armed services in the U.S. Was Daniel M. Piston college material? A decade ago, as a high-school student in Syracuse, N.Y., Mr. Piston
didn’t think so. He lacked focus. His grades were so-so. And it wasn’t
like he was surrounded by college graduates; of his family, only his
mother had earned an associate degree. "The truth is," Mr. Piston says, "I didn’t think I was smart enough for college." After finishing high school, he signed up for an
automotive-technology program at nearby Onondaga Community College — a
similar course his senior year was the first thing he had been any good
at, he says — but, still unmoored, he dropped out after two semesters.
He found himself on the doorstep of the local Navy recruiter. The Navy
promised excitement, and it offered something else: a life path. Continue reading here.
PLEASE SEE ME
It
all began with a simple message that I wrote on the tests or
assignments of students who were struggling: “Please see me so we can
discuss your performance on the test (or assignment). Let’s see what we
can do to improve your grade.” Although initially I was not collecting data on the effectiveness of
my “invitation,” I soon realized that most of students—about 80
percent—responded to it. Notably, those who met with me began to do
better on future tests; their assignments improved as well. When
students did not respond to my invitation, after about a week I reached
out to them with a simple email. Some responded, some did not. Over time
it became difficult to ignore the benefits of having those meetings
with students who were struggling. I think the most important message of
these meetings was to convey to them that they were not simply a name
in my gradebook but that I really cared about their learning and their
success. Continue reading here.
STUDENT SUCCESS IN INNOVATIVE LEARNING
As we continue to broaden the innovative learning opportunities, it is always important to remember that student success is as important as providing scheduling options for our students. Rob Kelly has written an interesting article on this topic. He says, "Offering different kinds of courses is not a simple matter of taking
the content and dividing it in ways to fill an unusual time slot.
Imagine converting a lecture-based course that normally meets three
times a week to a block format that consists of a single four-hour
session. The instructor might be a great lecturer, but it’s unlikely
that he or she could engage students for hours at a time. “There is a world of difference, or there should be a world of
difference, between teaching a class that meets three times a week for
fifty minutes, teaching that same class that meets once a week from
eight until noon, teaching that class in an accelerated format that
meets three or four days a week, or teaching it online,” Glenn says. “As
we get better at offering these different formats, hopefully we get
better at delivering the instruction in these formats.” Continuing reading here.
HOW TO MONOTASK
Here is an interesting article about the battle for attention that our reading assignments face. Stop what you’re doing. Well, keep reading. Just stop everything else that you’re doing. Mute
your music. Turn off your television. Put down your sandwich and ignore
that text message. While you’re at it, put your phone away entirely.
(Unless you’re reading this on your phone. In which case, don’t. But the
other rules still apply.) Just read. You are now monotasking. Maybe this doesn’t feel like a big deal. Doing one thing at a time isn’t a new idea. Indeed, multitasking, that bulwark of anemic résumés everywhere, has come under fire in recent years. A 2014 study in the Journal of Experimental Psychology
found that interruptions as brief as two to three seconds — which is to
say, less than the amount of time it would take you to toggle from this
article to your email and back again — were enough to double the number
of errors participants made in an assigned task.